CAPTURE OF SADDAM HUSSEIN AND THE NEW BABYLON : PT 3

Copyright 1994 - 2008 Endtime Prophecy Net

Last Updated : July 23, 2006

Saddam Was Globally-Recognized Leader Of A Sovereign Iraq,
Bush The Unilateralist And Lawless One, America Discredits
Hans Blix And UN Inspectors, Bush's Fears Lost Opportunity
To Remove Saddam, Tony Blair's Foolish Mistake, Shoot Now
And Ask Questions Later, Bush's Dangerous Precedent, Attack
At Republican Palace Hotel, Situation Out Of Control, Bush
Caught In Iraq Quagmire, Israel's Nuclear Status, America's
Blind Eye, Hypocrisy Of Elite Nuclear Club, Mistrust Between
USA And Russia, Bush And Putin: The Odd Couple, Did Saddam
Really Threaten You?, "What If" Scenario, Opinions Based On
Information, US Inability To Find WMD In Iraq, Unwinding The
Deception: A Premeditated Plan?, Did Bush Really Know, Short
Memory Span, Possibility Of Planted Evidence, Soften Up The
American Public, Bush Re-Election Strategies, UN Hesitation
To Help Bush, Damage Control, Endtime Deception, Vote Wisely
Iraq War A Stain On Bush Presidency, Other Bush Deficiencies

Returning to the political angle of our discussion, as I said
a moment ago, regardless of whether he was loved or hated, it
doesn't change the fact that Saddam Hussein was nevertheless
the globally-recognized leader of Iraq; and Iraq was, and is,
an internationally-recognized sovereign nation. Having said
that, everything that George Bush has done in regards to Iraq
and Saddam Hussein since the war began, has been contrary to
International Law; a law which Mr. Bush claims to recognize
and uphold. Mr. Bush has unilaterally acted contrary to the
general consensus of the world body of nations, which clearly
agreed that the UN weapons inspectors, lead by Mr. Hans Blix,
should have been given more time to complete their tasks. But
as we all know, or should know, that is exactly what Mr. Bush
and his team feared the most. Not only did they fight against
the inspectors from the very beginning, by showing no faith
in them, by trying to discredit their level of expertise, and
by criticizing their slow results, but they were also afraid
that in the end, Mr. Blix might issue a final report in which
Saddam Hussein would be cleared of all charges; in which case
the sanctions would be lifted; and Iraq would be welcomed back
into full fellowship with the world body of nations, with
Saddam Hussein still in power.

Mr. Bush could not take that chance, because he had his own
agenda; which as in previous instances, was contrary to the
agenda of the United Nations. Thus, President Bush chose to
huff and puff and threaten, and apply pressure to the UN,
until it finally backed down, the UNMOVIC team left Iraq,
and Mr. Bush was allowed to start his war, with Tony Blair
faithfully bringing up the rear as he seems to enjoy doing.
Well, if you follow the news closely, then you will already
know that Mr. Blair has been taking just as much heat back
in Great Britain, as President Bush has in the United States,
regarding their deceptive game. Blair deserves it for having
foolishly followed Bush into an illegal, unprovoked war.

As I have told our mailing list members before, the United
States of America has basically adopted a policy of "Shoot
now and ask questions later". That seems to be the essence
of Mr. Bush's foreign policy in regards to Iraq, and it is a
very dangerous policy; particularly because the leaders of
several other nations have since publicly adopted the very
same policy. They figure, "If America can do it, so can we".
For example, following the Bali attack, Prime Minister John
Howard publicly stated that Australia reserves the right to
strike pre-emptively, in order to save Australian lives.
Israel has likewise adopted a similar policy with its well-
publicized assassinations of Palestinian militant leaders
and operatives. In fact, I was just reading yesterday where
the Deputy Defense Minister of Israel, Zeev Boim, publicly
stated that the blind spiritual leader and founder of Hamas,
Sheik Ahmed Yassin, is "marked for death", and had better
hide underground; which was obviously a reference to how
Saddam Hussein was hiding in a hole in the ground at the
time of his capture.

So as you can plainly see, America's leader has in fact set
an extremely dangerous precedent, which others are eager to
follow. He has opened the proverbial Pandora's Box. If wars
can now be initiated based upon mere suspicions and fears,
without any real clear-cut proof of guilt, or any evidence
of an "imminent threat" and major loss of life, then this
world is in very serious trouble, and may God help us all!
Sadly, the questions are now finally being asked, but it is
a little too late. The war has already been waged, a beast
has been let loose, and the so-called "evidence" has been
found to be bogus.

The situation is clearly spiraling out of control in Iraq
with each passing day, regardless of what the White House
may say. Remember; they are in damage control mode and will
not tell you the truth. Even as I've been proofreading this
series in order to add it to our web site, shocking events
continue to occur in Iraq. Major American news agencies are
now reporting that early this morning, Sunday, another bomb
attack occurred right near the main gate of the American
occupation headquarters, which is located in the Republic
Palace Hotel, on the bank of the Tigris River, right across
from central Baghdad. They are currently reporting at least
twenty-three people dead; two or more of them Americans, and
the rest Iraqis; as well as at least sixty people wounded;
and those figures may possibly change as more information is
made available. This attack now raises American casualties in
Iraq to over five hundred,; and there is no doubt in my mind
that Mr. Bush is deeply concerned.

The minute that L. Paul Bremer III leaves Iraq for a few
days, the Iraqi defenders strike right at the heart of the
American operations. It is obvious that as long as these
kinds of deadly attacks are occurring, there is no way that
sovereignty can safely be handed over to the Iraqis by June,
as the Americans are promising to do. In fact, they continue
to say that the transfer of power will occur on that date,
in spite of this most recent attack. As a result of these
kinds of attacks, it seems to me that the United States is
stuck in Iraq until true peace can be achieved. Mr. Bush has
unwittingly trapped himself in a quagmire, and there is no
way out at this point, without him looking like a coward, as
well as a traitor to the Iraqis. Bush knows that he cannot
promise them a new nation, peace, democracy and freedom, and
then just run off and abandon Iraq, (as he obviously did
with Afghanistan), when the going gets rough; even if the
2004 election is drawing closer by the day. He needs to stay
the course and fulfill his stated objectives to the Iraqis,
even if those objectives were merely a cloak of deception.

Earlier, I rhetorically asked you why, when there are so
many ruthless dictators around the world who oppress their
people, did the United States of America choose to target
Mr. Hussein? Allow me to ask you another pertinent question
now; and again, the answer is rather obvious. Why did the
USA, without any concrete proof, target Saddam Hussein over
the WMD issue, when there are clearly other countries around
the world, which do unmistakably possess nuclear technology,
and some of which have outright refused to sign the Nuclear
Non-Proliferation Treaty? More specifically, while Israel
has never made a public declaration regarding its nuclear
status, everyone in-the-know realizes that she does possess
such technology. That being the case, why has she never been
taken to task by the United States, to give an account of
her nuclear inventory? Even though Israel refuses to sign
the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, the United States just
turns a blind eye to the whole affair!

As I said, the answer is rather obvious. Unless it's playing
hardball for some particular reason, such as because it wants
a concession from one of its allies, the American Government
does not normally make it a practice to openly embarrass it
nuclear-owning friends; it only likes to expose and attack
those nations which it doesn't like, such as George Bush's
so-called "axis of evil". It will simply turn a blind eye to
the misdeeds of its friends. Why does Israel have the right
to possess nuclear weapons, while other nations such as Iran,
North Korea, Libya, etc., do not? Is Israel such a peaceful
country? Not by any means! Can you see the prejudice and the
preferential treatment being given here to one of America's
friends and allies?

If the elite nuclear club which formulated the NPT is really
sincere about wanting to see the world completely rid of
nuclear weapons, shouldn't it begin by cleaning up its own
house first? Shouldn't it be leading by a clear example? How
can it tell Iraq, Iran, India, Pakistan, Libya, North Korea
or any other nation for that matter, to cease and desist,
when they, the nuclear elite, are sitting upon the largest
and deadliest nuclear, chemical and biological stockpiles in
the entire world? I am reminded of some of our Lord's words
when He exposed the hypocrisy of the Jewish Scribes and
Pharisees of His day. Jesus said:

"...The scribes and the Pharisees sit in Moses' seat: All
therefore whatsoever they bid you observe, that observe and
do; but do not ye after their works: for they say, and do
not." Matthew 23:2-3, KJV

While some of you may not realize this, even the nuclear
agreements between the United States and Russia are a big
joke, and are really only meant for public consumption. Why?
Because while both sides claim that they will cut back their
nuclear arsenals by so many warheads by a certain year, the
truth of the matter is that they are not really destroying
them, they are only "decommissioning" them. In other words,
if a moment of need arrived, the order could easily be given
to reactivate them.

So why is it that nations like the USA and Russia don't lead
by example by completely eliminating their nuclear weapons?
Again, the answer is rather obvious. First, as I've already
stated, it is their very nuclear stockpiles which allow them
to retain their positions as the "kings of the mountain". In
addition to this, in spite of all of the public back-slapping
the Odd Couple has done before the cameras, the truth of the
matter is that they really don't trust each other as much as
they would like everyone to think they do. Considering the
Texas oilman's background, and the ex-KGB man's history, is
it really any wonder? Deep-seated beliefs and mistrust die
hard.

And one final question which I would like to direct to our
American civilian readers: Have you personally really ever
felt threatened by Saddam Hussein? Have you personally ever
woke up in the morning, shaking in your boots, and feeling
like Saddam Hussein was going to blow your house off the map
at any minute? I didn't think so. Considering that Saddam
had highly-inaccurate SCUD missiles over a dozen years ago,
which could barely make it to Israel, and that not one shred
of evidence has ever surfaced to suggest that he possessed
anything much more advanced than that, doesn't the idea of
feeling threatened by Mr. Hussein in the continental USA,
literally thousands of miles away from Iraq, seem rather
ludicrous and far-fetched? Yet many of you agreed to Bush's
war for that very reason. You believed the big lie. Shame on
you! What in the world were some of you thinking?

Given all of the truth which has been revealed in the last
few months, you can't even fall back on the fear that Saddam
might have sold part of his nuclear arsenal to al-Qaeda. Why?
Because not only did he not possess any working WMD himself,
but as we have already seen, Saddam clearly had no desire or
intention to even work with al-Qaeda; and Osama bin Laden had
similar thoughts regarding working with Saddam, even though
his people had approached him about doing exactly that. They
had two different agendas. Case dismissed!

Now, it has occurred to me that some of you might possibly
pose the question, "What if someday down the road, American
forces in Iraq do discover Saddam's hidden nuclear, chemical
and biological arsenals? Then what would you say? Would you
take back everything you have written here?

Well, you know, I have given a lot of thought to this entire
issue since it first began; and I have considered that kind
of scenario. I would respond in the following manner. First
of all, everything I have stated here is based upon official
government and mass media releases. I haven't just drawn it
out of thin air or made it up. The opinions I have expressed
here are the result of factual information which any person
can find on the Internet with a little bit of effort. Now,
if any of that information is inaccurate in any way, or even
outright wrong, then I cannot be held accountable for that.
I can only formulate my opinions based upon the information
that is available.

That issue aside, my view is this: If after some nine months
of searching, they were finally able to find Saddam Hussein
hiding in a small hole in the ground right under their noses,
(please note that they had searched near that location a few
times previously), then I would think that they would have
even less difficulty finding, in President Bush's own words,
"thousands of tons of chemical agents", as well as thousands
of "liters of anthrax and other deadly biological agents",
if they really existed. I mean, being a human being, Saddam
Hussein possessed the ability to remain mobile. If US Forces
got too close to him, he could just move to a new location.
As you may recall, according to the American government and
news sources, Saddam was supposedly changing location every
few hours in order to avoid being caught; yet after a number
of failed attempts, they finally caught up with him after
receiving an important credible tip.

On the other hand, we are talking about "thousands of tons
of chemical agents", and thousands of "liters of anthrax and
other deadly biological agents". That material would take up
a considerable amount of space, as would a nuclear arsenal,
or equipment to build a nuclear stockpile; and it could not
just get up and walk away whenever the American forces got
too close to it. Furthermore, with the Americans crawling
all over the country, neither could it be secretly moved by
the Iraqis. As I noted earlier, even the American officials
stated that it was impossible for the Iraqis to have simply
spirited such a huge amount of material out of their country,
without the Bush Administration knowing about it. They have
surveillance satellites, and other technologies which would
have aided them in discovering any mischief on the ground.

In short, if it really existed in such large quantities as
had been claimed by Mr. Bush, if at all, then it would have
to have remained in the same location where the Iraqis had
hidden it before the invasion began. In spite of months of
searching, the UNMOVIC team found nothing. In spite of the
American military forces searching since May of last year,
they have likewise found absolutely nothing. They can find
one man, Saddam Hussein, like a needle hidden in a haystack,
yet they cannot locate thousands of tons, and thousands of
liters of WMD, even though they possess all kinds of hi-tech
equipment which is specifically designed to detect such
things. Granted, Iraq is a large country, and there is a lot
of desert out there which needs to be searched; but by this
time, you would surely think that the UN, or the USA, would
have found something; at least the tip of the iceberg; but
they haven't. Are you starting to get the picture?

Perhaps we need to ask ourselves: Why is all of this info
coming out right now, which is an embarrassment to the Bush
Administration? Personally, I am beginning to wonder if it
wasn't planned in advance. It is just a personal speculation
on my part, but maybe it is true; you never know. What I mean
is this: The White House knew all along that they were highly
exaggerating the truth, and deceiving both the world and the
American public; but they were willing to play the game if it
would give them the opportunity to invade Iraq and take down
Saddam Hussein. But they also knew that the time would come
when they would have to slowly let the cat out of the bag,
and reveal the truth, because such things eventually leak out
anyway. It would obviously be risky business; but if they had
already accomplished their primary goal in Iraq, as they now
have, by taking down Saddam, then it would be time to slowly
start taking themselves off the hook, before it got too close
to the 2004 election; and that seems to be exactly what they
may have been doing over the past several months. They seem
to be unwinding the deceptive web they wove many months ago.

Carefully consider the following facts.

Contrary to popular perception, President Bush clarifies that
Saddam Hussein cannot be directly linked to the 9-11 attacks.
A few months pass by, and then Colin L. Powell announces that
there was never any hard evidence which might substantiate a
connection between Saddam Hussein and Osama bin Laden and the
al-Qaeda network. Next a document is discovered in Saddam's
possession, which conclusively proves that he was hesitant to
work with Osama bin Laden. Finally, we are informed that bin
Laden likewise had no interest in joining forces with Saddam
Hussein. Can you see a subtle pattern of events? The primary
two reasons which were put forth for going to war are slowly
being destroyed. We are slowly but surely being weaned from
the deception, as if a pre-determined script is intentionally
being followed. Maybe I am just a crazy conspiracy theorist
with a good imagination; or maybe there is some truth to what
I have just proposed. We may never know.

The only other alternative, is to accept that Mr. Bush truly
believed that the intelligence he was receiving was accurate,
and was therefore convinced that Saddam really did possess
tons of WMD. Now if that is indeed the case, then the fact
that none have been found to date, in spite of the fact that
almost two thousand qualified people from both the UN and the
USA have been looking for them for many months now, makes Mr.
Bush look rather stupid; and it also makes his intelligence
people look very inept. Personally, I have a difficult time
accepting this alternative. As the president, I think that
Bush knew the facts all along; and that he went along with
the deception from the beginning; and may have even put it
in motion, as Paul O'Neill stated: Bush gave the order, and
his people found the way to carry it out.

One thing that is true, is that the election is not that far
away; so if Bush and his team did want to take themselves off
the hook, now would certainly be the time to do it. Please
remember what I said earlier in part one. The American public
has a short memory span and a tendency to forgive and forget.
In spite of everything that Bush and his cronies have done to
deceive the American people into accepting his war, there are
still a lot of people who like Mr. Bush, and who would, and
will, vote for him in November. If the Bush Administration is
truly weaning the American public from the deception right
now, I wouldn't be surprised if they take it so far as to one
day say, "Oops! Sorry! We goofed! Our intelligence was wrong.
Saddam never had any WMD as we supposed; but it is a good
thing that we got rid of him anyway, because he was a tyrant
to his own people". Given the nature of the American people,
I think a lot of them would accept that and not blink an
eye, and still vote for Bush this coming November.

To complete my answer regarding the possibility that they
may still find some WMD in Iraq, allow me to add these final
thoughts. Given that the UNMOVIC team never found anything;
given that the US teams have never found any WMD after nine
months of searching for them; given that the USA has even
begun to pull out part of their search teams; and given that
the American military has had so much time to do whatever
they want in Iraq beyond the eyes of international scrutiny,
it would require a lot to convince me personally, of any
evidence which might surface at this late date. My skeptical
nature would cause me to strongly wonder if it might not have
been planted; either to save the election for George Bush,
or perhaps for America to save face before the world. Quite
frankly, I don't think that they even really care what the
world thinks. They didn't care when they illegally attacked
and invaded Iraq, did they? They took down Saddam Hussein as
planned, so they got what they wanted. Whether or not they
will get the rest still remains to be seen. As I said before,
over five hundred American casualties, and still rising, must
surely worry President Bush. He may have his Viet Nam.

Mr. Bush still has nine months left to soften up the American
public, and make them forget his deceptions; that is, if the
Democrats will let him, which I doubt. They are going to be
hitting the president hard in every way that they can. If you
read the news a lot as I do, then you can see signs of the
Bush re-election strategy everywhere. For example, have you
noticed how they've been working really hard to tell us that
the status of the American economy is improving? Don't be
surprised if that kind of talk continues all the way up to
the election. Unemployment and a weak economy are some of
the things which are dragging down Bush's points in all the
opinion polls; although I personally don't put much faith in
those polls, being as they are so manipulated, and based on
such a small percentage of the general populace.

Have you also noticed how Mr. Bush has been wooing his big
rich friends with the controversial tax cuts? Or how about
the fact that he is also wooing the much-needed Christian
Right with his talk of having a marriage clause amended to
the Constitution of the United States? Of course, you will
also notice that he has not made a firm commitment to do
that, but has only more or less threatened to do it, if the
gay and lesbian community continues to push for legalized
marriage for gays and lesbians. Yet at the same time, in a
recent remark, Mr. Bush also seemed to be straddling the
fence, because while he stated that he is of the opinion
that marriage is a sacred institution between a man and a
woman, he also said that people can do what they can do
legally, as long as it is according to the laws of their
state. So Bush is really sending mixed signals there.

And don't forget the Latinos. Oh yes, Bush is trying to win
them as well. What do you think giving temporary work visas
to millions of illegal migrant workers from Mexico is all
about, if not winning the vote of America's large Mexican
population? Between that, and Bush's recent trip to Mexico,
plus the fact that Mexican-Americans seem to idolize General
Sanchez, the man who is leading the forces in Iraq, Bush may
very well have the Latino vote in his pocket.

The new urgency with which the Bush Administration is trying
to turn over sovereignty to the Iraqis is another sign that
they are becoming nervous as the election draws closer. For
months and months, Mr. Bush snubbed the United Nations and
the opinion of the world; but as I stated earlier, now that
rebuilding Iraq is proving to be a lot more difficult of a
challenge, with the Kurds making demands, and the Shiites
making demands, and the Sunnis making demands, and American
soldiers still dying over there, the President is suddenly
appealing to Kofi Annan and the United Nations, to step in
and offer some assistance with the upcoming caucus-style
elections. However, until now, Mr. Annan has been rather
cautious regarding intervening at this particular moment.

The UN Secretary General's concern seems to be three-fold.
First of all, as a result of the devastating attack on the
UN headquarters in Baghdad this past summer, which, as you
may recall, left twenty-two people dead, he is obviously
concerned about the continuing security situation. The fact
that American soldiers, Iraqis, and personnel from other
countries continue to die, certainly doesn't help to build
his confidence. Second, Mr. Annan is concerned about the
very nature of the electoral process being proposed by the
Bush Administration. Not only is it very complex, but the
bottom line, as the Iraqis understand, is that it will not
be a true democratic election by any means. Thus, Mr. Annan
is hesitant to offer UN involvement at this time, as it will
appear as if he is rubber-stamping the American deception.
Third, Mr. Annan does not wish for the United Nations to be
used by the Bush Administration as another tool for them to
win the presidential race; and that is exactly how it would
appear, were the UN to concede to Mr. Bush's wishes. As you
may have heard, just a few days ago, there was a very large
protest in the southern Iraqi city of Basra; (a city which
is mentioned in the Scriptures by the way); in which tens of
thousands of Iraqis participated, under the inspiration of
Grand Ayatollah Ali al-Sistani. As I noted earlier, they are
insisting on open, democratic elections.

So my point is, the Bush team is very busy right now, doing
damage control over the Iraq dilemma, as well as trying to
consolidate Bush's support base all across the country.

If you, the reader, are a citizen of the United States of
America; and if you voted for George Bush during the last
presidential election; and if you have been so naive as to
support his current war in Iraq, then I truly hope that this
series is serving as a wake-up call for you. I hope that
your desire to know the truth is stronger than your American
patriotism. I hope that you can now see how your president
has lied to you, and deceived you, and manipulated you since
this whole sad affair began. Again I am reminded of a verse
from the Scriptures which perfectly describes the Endtime
when it says:

"But evil men and seducers shall wax worse and worse,
deceiving, and being deceived." 2 Timothy 3:13, KJV

If you are politically active, and if it is your intention
to vote this coming November, then I hope that you will vote
wisely, and choose a man who is known for his honesty, his
integrity, and his Christian values, if such an individual
exists in the current presidential race. That is for you
alone to determine. Personally, I do not consider myself a
part of this world according to the Scriptures, so I do not
participate in the election process. If you do vote, don't
be swayed by mere words and political rhetoric; because as
I am sure you realize, politicians will say anything before
a camera in order to win your vote. They will tickle your
ears and promise you the world, and then give you none or
very little of it. Promises last about just as long as the
election does.

Before switching gears in this series, allow me to add just
a few more comments. I am sure that it's rather obvious that
I strongly disagree with Mr. Bush regarding his decision to
go to war against Iraq. I am convinced that he deceived the
American public, either knowingly, or possibly due to his
own ignorance, because he is manipulated by others. While he
has made a few decisions, or taken a few stands with which I
can agree, nevertheless, he is not without reproach; and the
Iraq war will be a stain on his presidency, just as war was
a stain on the reign of King David of old. It was because he
was a man of war, the Scriptures tell us, that the Lord did
not allow David to build the temple, as we see here:

"Then David the king stood up upon his feet, and said, Hear
me, my brethren, and my people: As for me, I had in mine
heart to build an house of rest for the ark of the covenant
of the LORD, and for the footstool of our God, and had made
ready for the building: But God said unto me, Thou shalt not
build an house for my name, because thou hast been a man of
war, and hast shed blood." 1 Chronicles 28:2-3, KJV

Aside from the illegal war in Iraq, Mr. Bush has not shown
sufficient interest in caring for the poor, but rather has
bowed to the pressures of special interest groups, and has
favored the rich and the elite through tax cuts which will
further fill their pockets while doing nothing to help the
little man at the bottom. The Bible clearly states:

"If a brother or sister be naked, and destitute of daily
food, And one of you say unto them, Depart in peace, be ye
warmed and filled; notwithstanding ye give them not those
things which are needful to the body; what doth it profit?
Even so faith, if it hath not works, is dead, being alone.
Yea, a man may say, Thou hast faith, and I have works: shew
me thy faith without thy works, and I will shew thee my
faith by my works." James 2:15-18, KJV

"Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is
this, To visit the fatherless and widows in their
affliction, and to keep himself unspotted from the world."
James 1:27, KJV

So the point is, Mr. Bush needs to put more actions behind
his words, and behind his verbal display of Christianity, as
otherwise, he is just another hypocrite. As a result of his
ties to the oil and gas industry, Mr. Bush's environmental
record also leaves a lot to be desired. Pulling out of the
Kyoto Protocol was a real tragedy, and has had a negative
reciprocal effect. Following America's lead, others nations
have also begun to back-pedal on their commitment to ratify
and abide by the terms of the Kyoto Protocol, and it is now
all but dead. In the Book of Revelation, we are told that
God will destroy those who destroy the Earth; and some of
the activities being championed by Mr. Bush are doing just
that:

"And the nations were angry, and thy wrath is come, and the
time of the dead, that they should be judged, and that thou
shouldest give reward unto thy servants the prophets, and to
the saints, and them that fear thy name, small and great;
and shouldest destroy them which destroy the earth."
Revelation 11:18, KJV

As we conclude this series in part four, we will begin to
address the important issue of how American intervention in
Iraq, and the capture of Saddam Hussein, affects our current
understanding of Endtime prophecy. This will include looking
at such issues as the Beast of the Book of Revelation and
the King of the North found in the prophecies of Daniel; the
deadly wound of the Beast; Turkey and Syria's possible roles
in Endtime events; the bold move towards democracy in Iraq;
America's Middle East agenda; the dangers faced by Syria and
Iran; the possible destruction of America; possible delay in
the Endtime Countdown and the not-so-imminent Return of Jesus
Christ; the "Pre-Tribulation Rapture" theory; the destruction
of Babylon the Great by the Beast and the Ten Horns; theories
concerning Babylon's possible identity Of Babylon; the power
of the oil weapon; the globalists and their New World Order;
John Lennon's "Imagine"; the birth and destruction of "New
Babylon"; and our duty to God as Endtime Christians. I trust
that you will join me for the conclusion of this series.

Go To Part Four . . .